Long term conductivity of narrow fractures filled with a proppant monolayer in shale gas reservoirs

  • Yuxuan Liu Southwest Petroleum University
Keywords: Fracture conductivity, finite element method, hydraulic fracturing, proppant embedment, shale gas reservoirs

Abstract

The primary goal of hydraulic fracturing is to create a high conductive pathway. Gas shale is mainly fractured by slick-water. A complex network of narrow secondary fractures is created in slick water fracturing. These narrow fractures without proppants maintain low conductivity. A partial monolayer of proppant can be used to enhance the conductivity of these fractures and then improve the production. Due to the interaction between proppants and fracture surface under confining stress, the proppants will embed into the formations, which results in a decrease in fracture width and conductivity. Researches available in literature have addressed the problem. However, the shale reveals varying amounts of creep deformation in response to applied stress, which will continuously enhance the proppant embedment and reduce fracture width. The influence of this time dependent effect on the long term conductivity of partial monolayer proppant is not well understood. Study the characteristics and controlling factors of the long term change in conductivity can benefit to the production analysis and hydraulic fracturing optimization. Therefore, models combined numerical and analytical methods are developed in this paper. A finite element model is developed to simulate the long term change in fracture width. Then a simplified model based on Carman-Kozeny equation is used to calculate the long term conductivity. Simulation results show that after considering long term creep effects, there is still an optimal proppant concentration, which remains the maximum residual conductivity after proppant embedment. And the calculated optimal proppant concentration becomes larger than that without considering the long term effect. The simulation results also indicate that the optimal concentration depends on stress, rock mechanical properties, proppant mechanical properties and time.

References

Alramahi, B. & Sundberg, M.I. 2012. Proppant embedment and conductivity of hydraulic fractures in shales. Paper ARMA-2012-291, presented at 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, Illinois.

Almasoodi, M.M., Abousleiman, Y.N. & Hoang, S.K. 2014. Viscoelastic Creep of Eagle Ford Shale: Investigating Fluid-Shale Interaction. Paper SPE171569, presented at SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Cipolla, C. 2009. Modeling production and evaluating fracture performance in unconventional gas reservoirs, Journal of Petroleum Technology 61 (9): 84-90.

Chang, C. & Zoback, M.D. 2009. Viscous creep in room-dried unconsolidated Gulf of Mexico shale (I): Experimental results. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 69(3): 239-246.

Deng, S.C., Li, H.B., Ma, G.W., Huang, H. & Li, X. 2014. Simulation of shale–proppant interaction in hydraulic fracturing by the discrete element method, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 70: 219-228.

Economides, M.J. & Nolte, K.G. 2000. Reservoir stimulation (3nd Ed). Wiley, England.

Fredd, C.N., McConnell, S.B., Boney, C.L. & England K.W. 2001. Experimental Study of Fracture Conductivity for Water-Fracturing and Conventional Fracturing Applications. SPE Journal 6(3): 288-298.

Guo, J.C., Lu, C., Zhao, J.Z. & Wang, W.Y. 2008. Experimental Research on Proppant Embedment. Journal of China Coal Society 33(6): 661-664. (In Chinese)

Guo, J.C. & Liu, Y.X. 2012. Modeling of proppant embedment: elastic deformation and creep deformation, Paper SPE 157449, presented at SPE international Production and Operations Conference & Exhibition, Doha, Qatar.

Huitt, J.L. & McGlothlin Jr, B.B. 1958. The Propping of Fractures in Formations Susceptible to Propping-sand Embedment, Paper SPE 58-115, presented at the spring meeting of the Pacific Coast District, Division of Production, Los Angeles, Calif, U.S.A

Hartley, R. & Bosma, M. 1985. Fracturing in chalk completions (includes associated papers 14483 and 14682). Journal of Petroleum Technology 37(1): 73-79

Johnson, K.L. 1987. Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Khanna, A., Kotousov, A., Sobey, J. & Weller, P. 2012. Conductivity of narrow fractures filled with a proppant monolayer. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 100: 9-13.

Kaviany, M. 1995. Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media (2nd Ed). Springer, Berlin.

Lacy, L.L., Rickards, A.R. & Ali, S.A. 1997. Embedment and Fracture Conductivity in Soft Formations Associated with HEC, Borate and Water-Based Fracture Designs. Paper SPE 38590, presented at the SPE Annual technical Conference and exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A

Lacy, L.L., Rickards, A.R. & Bilden, D.M. 1998. Fracture width and embedment testing in soft reservoir sandstone. SPE Drilling & Completion 13(1): 25-29

Lu, C., Guo, J.C., Wang, W.Y., Deng, Y. & Liu D.F. 2008. Experimental Research on Proppant Embedment and Its Damage to Fractures Conductivity. Natural Gas Industry 28(2): 99-101 (In Chinese)

Li, K.W., Gao, Y.P., Lv, Y.C. & Wang, M. 2014. New Mathematical Models for Calculating Proppant Embedment and Fracture Conductivity. SPE Journal 20(3): 496 - 507

Losh, S., Eglinton, L., Schoell, M. & Wood, J. 1999. Vertical and lateral fluid flow related to a large growth fault, South Eugene Island Block 330 Field, offshore Louisiana. AAPG bulletin 83(2): 244-276.

Neto, L.B. & Kotousov, A. 2013. Residual opening of hydraulic fractures filled with compressible proppant. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 61: 223-230.

Palisch, T.T., Duenckel, R.J., Bazan, L.W., Heidt, H.J. & Turk G.A. 2007. Determining Realistic Fracture Conductivity and Understanding Its Impact on Well Performance-Theory and Field Examples, Paper SPE 106301, presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.

Sanematsu, P., Shen, Y., Thompson, K., Yu, T., Wang, Y., Chang, D. L. & Willson, C. 2015. Image-based Stokes flow modeling in bulk proppant packs and propped fractures under high loading stresses. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135: 391-402.

Volk, L.J., Raible, C.J., Carroll, H.B. & Spears, J.S. 1981. Embedment of High Strength Proppant into Low-permeability Reservoir Rock, Paper SPE/DOE 9867, presented at the 1981 SPE/DOE Low Permeability Symposium, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A

Wen, Q.Z., Zhang, S.C., Wang, L., Liu, Y.S. & Li, X.P. 2007. The effect of proppant embedment upon the long-term conductivity of fractures. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 55(3): 221-227

Wriggers, P. 2006. Computational contact mechanics(2nd Ed). Springer, Berlin.

Yan, X., Huang, Z., Yao, J., Song, W., Li, Y. & Gong, L. 2016. Theoretical analysis of fracture conductivity created by the channel fracturing technique. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 31: 320-330.

Zhang, J.J., Ouyang, L.C., Zhu, D. & Hill, A.D. 2015. Experimental and numerical studies of reduced fracture conductivity due to proppant embedment in the shale reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 130: 37-45

Published
2017-08-01
Section
Petroleum Engineering