Thermomechanical evaluation of sustainable foamed concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash and eggshell powder

  • Ashfaque Ahmed Jhatial Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Campus, Khairpur Mirs', Sindh http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-5595

Abstract

Increased usage of concrete contributes towards urban thermal discomfort due to Urban Heat Island effect while the corresponding increased consumption of cement also cause significant rise in carbon dioxide gas emissions. This experimental work aims at investigating the performance of 1800 kg/m3 dry density green sustainable foamed concrete (GFC) when locally available wastes such as POFA and ESA are utilized as supplementary cementitious materials. The POFA content varied by replacing cement replacement from 15 to 35%, which increament of 5%, while being supplemented with 5% ESA. To investigate the performance of the developed sustainable foamed concrete, the flowability, mechanical strengths (compressive and splitting tensile strengths) and thermal performances (thermal conductivity and surface temperature) were assessed. Incorporation of 15-25% of POFA supplemented with 5% ESA as partial cement replacement materials resulted in enhanced mechanical strengths. Although usage of POFA can reduce the thermal conductivity, the POFA content must be limited to 15-25% to prevent excessive heat absorption by the exterior surface of concrete. In overall, an optimum use of 15% POFA in combination of 5% ESA is desirable for the production of a sustainable foamed concrete.

References

Abdullah, K., Hussin, M. W., Zakaria, F., Muhamad, R., Hamid, Z. A. 2006. POFA: A potential cement replacement material in aerated concrete. Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 5-6: 132 – 140.

Alnahhal, M. F., Alengaram, U. J., Jumaat, M. Z., Abutaha, F., Alqedra, M. A., Nayaka, R. R. 2018. Assessment on engineering properties and CO2 emissions of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating waste products as supplements to Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203: 822 – 835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.292

Anting, N., Din, M.F.M., Iwao, K., Ponraj, M., Siang, A.J.L.M., Yong, L.Y., Prasetijo, J. 2018. Optimizing of near infrared region reflectance of mix-waste tile aggregate as coating material for cool pavement with surface temperature measurement. Energy and Buildings, 158: 172 – 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.001

Assi, L., Carter, K., Deaver, E. E., Anay, R., Ziehl, P. 2018. Sustainable concrete: Building a greener future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198: 1641 – 1651.

ASTM C114-15. Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM C1621 / C1621M-17. Standard Test Method for Passing Ability of Self-Consolidating Concrete by J-Ring. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM C618-17a. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

Benhelal, E., Zahedi, G., Shamsaei, E., Bahadori, A. 2013. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51: 142 – 161.

Bevilacqua, P., Mazzeo, D., Bruno, R., Arcuri, N. 2017. Surface temperature analysis of an extensive green roof for the mitigation of urban heat island in southern mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 150: 318 – 327.

BS EN 12664:2001. Thermal performance of building materials and products. Determination of thermal resistance by means of guarded hot plate and heat flow meter methods. Dry and moist products of medium and low thermal resistance, British Standards.

BS EN 12390-3:2009. British Standard, Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimen, British Standards.

BS EN 12390-6:2009. British Standard, Testing hardened concrete. Tensile splitting strength of test specimens, British Standards.

Chindaprasirt, P., Rukzon, S., Sirivivatnanon, V. 2008. Resistance to chloride penetration of blended Portland cement mortar containing palm oil fuel ash, rice husk ash and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 22(5): 932 – 938.

Chindaprasirt, P., Homwuttiwong, S., Jaturapitakkul, C. 2007. Strength and water permeability of concrete containing palm oil fuel ash and rice husk-bark ash. Construction and Building Materials, 21: 1492 – 1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.015

Demirboga, R. 2003. Influence of mineral admixtures on thermal conductivity and compressive strength of mortar. Energy and Buildings, 35(2): 189 – 192.

Dhanalakshmi, M., Sowmya, N., Chandrashekar, A. 2015. A Comparative Study on Egg Shell Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Fly Ash. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 4(05): 1532 – 1537.

Embrandiri, A., Singh, R. P., Ibrahim, H. M., Ramli, A. A. 2012. Land application of biomass residue generated from palm oil processing: its potential benefits and threats. The Environmentalist, 32(1): 111 – 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9367-0

Ghani, S. A., Zakaria, A., Shakaff, A. Y., Ahmad, M. N., Abdullah, A. H. 2012. Enhancing conductive polymer performance using eggshell for ammonia sensor. Journal of Physical Science, 23(2): 73 – 83.

Gowsika D., Sarankokila, S. and Sargunan, K. 2014. Experimental investigation of egg shell powder as partial replacement with cement in concrete. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 14(2): 65 – 68. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v14p214

Hamada, H. M., Jokhio, G. A., Yahaya, F. M., Humada, A. M., Gul, Y. 2018. The present state of the use of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 175: 26 – 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.227

Jaturapitakkul, C., Kiattikomol, K., Tangchirapat, W., Saeting, T. 2006. Evaluation of the sulfate resistance of concrete containing palm oil fuel ash. Construction and Building Materials, 21(7): 1399 – 1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.005

Kamaruddin, S., Goh, W.I., Jhatial, A.A. and Lakhiar, M.T. 2018. Chemical and Fresh State Properties of Foamed Concrete Incorporating Palm Oil Fuel Ash and Eggshell Ash as Cement Replacement. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2018, 7(4.30), pp. 350 – 354.

Lim, S. K., Tan, C. S., Lim, O. Y., Lee, Y. L. 2013. Fresh and hardened properties of lightweight foamed concrete with palm oil fuel ash as filler. Construction and Building Materials, 46: 39 – 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.015

Liu, M. Y. J., Alengaram, U. J., Jumaat, M. Z., Mo, K. H. 2014. Evaluation of thermal conductivity, mechanical and transport properties of lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concrete. Energy and Buildings, 72: 238 – 245.

Mo, K. H., Bong, C. S., Alengaram, U. J., Jumaat, M. Z., Yap, S. P. 2017. Thermal conductivity, compressive and residual strength evaluation of polymer fibre-reinforced high volume palm oil fuel ash blended mortar. Construction and Building Materials,130: 113-121

Munir, A., Abdullah, Huzaim, Sofyan, Irfandi, Safwan 2015. Utilization of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) in producing lightweight foamed concrete for non-structural building material. Procedia Engineering, 125: 739 – 746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.119

Özyavuz, M., Bilgili, B. C., Elkıran, G. 2015. Temperature distribution and environmental impact of Tekirdag Ataturk Forest Nature Park. International Journal of Global Warming, 8(1): 102 – 113. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgw.2015.071581

Raji, S. A., Samuel, A. T. 2015. Egg Shell as a Fine Aggregate in Concrete for Sustainable Construction. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(09): 8 – 13.

Tangchirapat, W., Jaturapitakkul, C. 2010. Strength, drying shrinkage, and water permeability of concrete incorporating ground palm oil fuel ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(10): 767 – 774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.08.008

Tangchirapat, W., Saeting, T., Jaturapitakkul, C., Kiattikomol, K., Siripanichgorn, A. 2007. Use of waste ash from palm oil industry in concrete. Waste Management, 27(1): 81 – 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.014

Tay, J. H. 1990. Ash from oil-palm waste as a concrete material. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2(2): 94 - 105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1990)2:2(94)

Tonnayopas, D., Nilrat, F., Putto, K., Tantiwitayawanich, J. 2016. Effect of oil palm fiber fuel ash on compressive strength of hardening concrete. Proceedings of the 4th Thailand Materials Science and Technology Conference, Pathumthani, Thailand March 31-April 1, 2016: 1 – 3.

Ujin, F., Ali, K. S., Harith, Z. Y. H. 2017. The effect of eggshells ash on the compressive strength of concrete. Key Engineering Materials, 728: 402 – 407.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2015. Mineral commodity summaries 2015: U.S. Geological Survey. 196.

Yerramala, A. 2014. Properties of concrete with eggshell powder as cement replacement. The Indian Concrete Journal: 94 – 104.

Yusuff, A. S. 2017. Preparation and characterization of composite anthill-chicken eggshell adsorbent: Optimization study on heavy metals adsorption using response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(3): 120 - 130. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2017.120.130

Zahari, N. M., Rahman, I. A., Zaidi, A. M. A. 2009. Foamed concrete: potential application in thermal insulation. In Proceedings of MUCEET2009, Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology, June 20-22, 2009, MS Garden, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 2009: 47 – 52.

Zeyad, A. M., Johari, M. A. M., Tayeh, B. A., Yusuf, M. O. 2017. Pozzolanic reactivity of ultrafine palm oil fuel ash waste on strength and durability performances of high strength concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144: 511 – 522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.121

Zhang, J., Liu, G., Chen, B., Song, D., Qi, J., Liu, X. 2014. Analysis of CO2 emission for the cement manufacturing with alternative raw materials: a LCA based framework. Energy Procedia. 61: 2541 – 2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.041

Published
2021-09-01