Uncertainty Analysis for Hydraulic Cylinder Pressure Calculation of Orienter in Coiled Tubing Drilling
Orienter working pressure for coiled tubing drilling (CTD) is associated with the randomness of torque. Thus, a new method for orienter pressure design was built based on uncertainty analysis theory. The Monte-Carlo method was applied to simulate the distribution of torque parameters. The distribution types and functions of torque were obtained. Based on the functional relationship between the hydraulic cylinder working pressure and the friction torque, the probability distribution of working pressure was obtained with the probability theory. The control variable method was adopted to analyze the range of the hydraulic cylinder working pressure. Results show that working pressure is not a single value but an interval with cumulative probability change. The higher the confidence level, the narrower the pressure range, conversely, the wider the pressure range will be. The larger the mean square deviation, the wider the pressure range. With this new method, working pressure range of the orienter is obtained from 3.93 to 11.71 MPa, Uncertainty Analysis method can overcome the disadvantages of traditional method and provide more accurate references for hydraulic cylinder design of orienter in CTD.
Qingyou Liu, Dan Qu, Wei Li, 2011. The application of unconventional gas development in China for CTD. China Petroleum Machinery, (39):94-100
Li Meng,He Huiqun,Zhang Yunfei, 2015. The Status and Development Suggestion on the Coiled Tubing Drilling Orienter. China Petroleum Machinery, 43(1): 32-38
Deli Gao, Tanjin Jin, 2003. Research on Numerical Analysis of Drag and Torque for Xijiang Extended Reach Wells in South-China Sea. Oil Drilling &Production Technology, 25(5):89-93.
Ciccola, V. L. , 2007. Casing and liner drag forces as design and analysis parameter for complex architecture wells. SPE 107185.
Samuel G. R., Mason C. J., 2009. Surge and drag analysis for extended reach casing and casing flotation operations with centralizers. SPE Drilling & Completion; 24(4):473-483.
Zenghua Liu, 2016. Research on The Mechanical Properties of Rotary Drill Tool. Yangtze University, 56-60.
Adams A.J., Parfitt S.H.L., Reeves T.B., et al., 1993. Casing system risk analysis using structural reliability. SPE/IADC 25693
Cunha J.C.,Demirdal B.,Gui P., 2005. Use of quantitative risk analysis for uncertainty quantification on drilling operations review and lessons learned.SPE 94980.
Deo P, Xue C, Mendez F.,2009. Managing uncertainty of well log data in reservoir characterization. SPE118980: 260-267.
Meng Li, Kanhua Su, Zijian Li, 2017. Uncertainty Analysis Method of Casing Extrusion Load for Ultra-Deep Wells. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 113(4): 475-495.
Goldsworthy J S, Jaksa M B, Fenton, G A, et al., 2007. Effect of sample location on the reliability based design of pad foundations. Georisk, 1(3):155-166.
Y Maeda, M Yoshimi, E Yoshihisa, 2003. Stess Spectrum of the Jib of Rough Terrain Crane with Carrying a Load. Nippon Kikai Gakkai Kotsu, Butsuryu Bumon Taikai Ronbunshu, 12: 257-258.
Yoon J. I., Kwan A. K., Truong D. Q., 2009. A study on an energy saving electro-hydraulic excavator[C]// ICCAS-SICE, 2009. IEEE: 3825-3830.
Edwards D J, Holt G. D., 2010. Case study analysis of risk from using excavators as ‘cranes’. Automation in Construction, 19 (2):127-133.
Yinao Su, Jiazhi Bai, 1991. Three dimensional analysis of down hole motor with bent sub using beam column theory. Journal of petroleum, 12(3): 111-114.
Xiaojing Guan, Zhongdong Wang, Yiquan Liang, 2005. Analysis and application for the ability of drilling tools go through slim-hole horizontal well. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 4: 26-28.
R.C. Pessier, M.J. Fear, 1992. Quantifying Common Drilling Problems With Mechanical Specific Energy and a Bit-Specific Coefficient of Sliding Friction. SPE 24584.
Eric Maidla, Marc Haci, 2004. Understanding Torque: The key to Slide-Drilling Directional Wells[J]. IADC/SPE 87162.
Long Gang,Li Meng, Guang Zhichuan, 2013. Evaluation method of casing safety and reliability in deep wells. Petroleum drilling techniques, 41(4): 48-53.
Jitao Liu, Weihua Zhang, Zhongwei Wang, 2010. Structural Reliability Analysis Based on Number-theoretic Method. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46(6): 196-199.
Di Sciuva M, Lomario D, 2003. A comparison between Monte Carlo and FORMs in calculating the reliability of a composite structure. Composite Structures, 59:155-162 .
C. G. Blount, D. D. Hearn, M. L. Payne, 1998. Weight on Bit in Coiled Tubing Drilling: Collection and Analysis of Field Data. SPE 46008.
L.J. Leising, D.O. Hearn, E.A. Rike, 1996. Sidetracking Technology for Coiled-Tubing Drilling . SPE 30486.
De Shun, Wen Hui, Ping Yu, 2006. New approach for reliability-based design optimization . Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 19(4):514-517.
O’Coonor P. D. T., 2000. Commentary : Reliability-past, present, and future . IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 49(4):335-341.
Wonneberger S, 1994. Generalization of an invertiable mapping between probability and possibility . Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 64: 229-240.
Zhili Sun, Liangyu Chen, 2003. Practical mechanical reliability design theory and method . Beijing: Science Press.