Urban planning indicators in sustainable building assessment methods

  • Sanja Stevanovic University of Nis, Serbia
Keywords: Sustainable building assessment methods, Urban planning, Environment protection, Social interaction, Transport

Abstract

Sustainable building assessment methods have emerged as a well accepted way to measure the perceived level of sustainability and provide guidelines toward the current best practice. Urban planning, through site selection, treatment of vegetation and habitat, social interaction, and transport, represents an important role in such methods. Indicators related to urban planning in current sustainable building assessment methods are comprehensively reviewed here.

Author Biography

Sanja Stevanovic, University of Nis, Serbia

Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics

Research Assistant Professor

References

Adler, A., Armstrong, J.E., Fuller, S.K., Kalin, M., Karolides, A., Macaluso, J., Walker, H.A. 2006. Green building: project planning and cost estimating. Kingston: RSMeans.

Bowker, P., Escarameia, M., Tagg, A. 2007. Improving the flood performance of new buildings - Flood resilient construction, London: Department for communities and local government, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7730/flood_performance.pdf, accessed 14th Apr, 2015.

Brooks, N., Donaghy, K., Knaap, G.-J. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning. New York: Oxford University Press.

BuiltGreen Washington. A green building program, http://www.builtgreen.net/library/ documents/handbooks/BGHandbook-SingleFamily.pdf, accessed 9th Apr 2015.

CIB. 1999. Agenda 21 on sustainable construction, CIB Report Publication 237, http://cibworld.xs4all.nl/ dl/publications/agenda21.pdf, accessed 20th Mar 2015.

Congress for the New Urbanism. 2013. Charter of the New Urbanism. 2nd edition (Talen, E., ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

Dimitrijević, B. 2013. Towards the integration of sustainable infrastructure into the existing built environment. SPATIUM International Review, No. 29, pp. 30-36.

Đukić, A., Vukmirović, M. 2012. Redesigning the network of pedestrian spaces in the function of reduction of CO2 emission. Case study: Pančevo and Vršac. SPATIUM International Review, No. 27, pp. 31-39.

Haapio, A., Viitaniemi, P. 2008. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess., No. 28, pp. 469-482.

Hogan, C.M., Latshaw, G.L. 1973. The relationship between highway planning and urban noise. Proc. ASCE Urban Transportation Division, Environment Impact Specialty Conference, Chicago, May 21-23, 1973, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 109-126.

IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team (Pachauri, R.K. and Meyer, L.A., eds.). IPCC: Geneva.

McKenzie, S. 2004. Social sustainability: towards some definitions. Working paper series No. 27. Hawke Research Institute, Adelaide: University of South Australia.

Ristić, R., Radić, B., Nikić, Z., Trivan, G., Vasiljević, N., Dragićević, S., Živković, N., Radosavljević, Z. 2011. Erosion control and protection from torrential floods in Serbia - spatial aspects. SPATIUM International Review, No. 25, pp. 1-6.

Sekulić, M., Stanković, B., Jovanović Popović, M. 2013. Evaluation of green roof characteristics in green building assessment (in Serbian), Arhitektura i urbanizam, No. 38, pp. 33-40.

Sheltair group. 2004. Town of Banff - Green site and building guidelines. Vancouver, https://www.banff.ca/ DocumentCenter/View/530, accessed 16th Apr, 2015.

World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published
2018-05-02
Section
Civil Engineering