A framework for an on-demand dangerous goods routing support system for the metro Vancouver area

  • Karim El-Basyouny Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada
  • Tarek Sayed Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada
Keywords: Consequence, dangerous goods, dispersion model, probability, risk, routing.

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework that integrates existing climate conditions with a GeographicalInformation System (GIS) to develop an on-demand dangerous goods (DG) routing supportsystem. The framework focuses on mitigating the risks associated with DG transportationvia route selection. Evidently, DG routing involves a number of decisions that require theconsideration of multiple and sometimes conflicting risks. As a result, the framework includesa number of different routing criteria pertaining to safety, efficiency, security, and cost.The framework was applied to a large-scale transportation network representing the MetroVancouver area. The network was represented spatially in a GIS database along with a real-timedispersion plume model to simulate a specific chemical release under local weather conditions.The results show that different routing criteria lead to different optimal route choices. Theauthors also compared route selection based on the Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG)for protection and isolation actions with route selection based on dispersion models. Thecomparison results show that, when employing the ERG in a small spill scenario, decisionmakersare at risk of exposing a large number of individuals to severe health effects. Vice versa,if the ERG was to be followed in a large spill scenario, many individuals who are not at riskwould be unnecessarily evacuated. This translates into increased evacuation costs, and wastesthe time and effort of emergency personnel. The study shows that these issues are properlyaddressed if a dispersion model is used to refine the estimation of the impact zone by includingmeasures that are specific to the shipment.

References

Covellov, T. & Merkhofer, M. W. 1993. Risk assessment methods: Approaches for assessing health and

environmental risks. Plenum Press, NY.

Erkut, E. & Verter, V. 1998. Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Operational Research

Letters. 46, 625-642.

USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation) 1989. Guidelines for applying criteria to designate routes

for transporting hazardous materials. Report No. DOT/RSPA/OHMT- 89-02, Federal Highway

Administration, Washington, DC.

Abkowitz, M., Eiger, A. & Srinivasan, S. 1984. Estimating the release rates and costs of transporting

hazardous waste. Transportation Research Record 977: 22-30.

Pijawka, K., Foote S. & Soesilo, A. 1985. Risk assessment of transporting hazardous material: Route

analysis and hazard management. Transportation Research Record 1020: 1-6.

A framework for an on-demand dangerous goods routing support system for the metro Vancouver area 38

Radwan, E., Pijawka, K., Soesilo, A. & Shieh, F. 1986. Transportation of hazardous wastes in Arizona:

Development of a data base management system for basic analysis. Transportation Research

Record 1063: 1-7.

Abkowitz, M. & Cheng, P. D. M. 1988. Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements

of hazardous materials. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20(1):39-51.

Glickman, Theodore, S. 1991. An expeditious risk assessment of the highway transportation of flammable

liquids in bulk. Transportation Science 25:115- 123.

Harwood, W. D., Viner J. G. & Russell, E. R. 1991. Truck accident and release rates for hazmat routing.

ASCE Conference Proceeding Paper 177-190.

Harwood, W. D., Viner, J. G. & Russell, E. R. 1993. Procedure for developing truck accident and release

rates for hazmat routing. Journal of Transportation Engineering 119:189-199.

Saccomanno, F. & Shortreed, J. 1993. HAZMAT Transport risks: Societal and individual perspectives.

Journal of Transportation Engineering 119:177-188.

Erkut, E. & Ingolfsson, A. 2004. Transport risk models for hazardous materials: Revisited. Operational

Research Letters 33: 81-89.

Leonelli, P., Bonvicini, S. & Spadoni G. 2000. Hazardous materials transportation: A risk analysis based

routing methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 71: 283-300.

Huang, B., Cheu, R. L. & Liew, Y. S. 2003. GIS-AHP model for HAZMAT routing with security

considerations. IEEE 6th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Shanghai,

China.

Huang, B., Cheu, R. L. & Liew, Y. S. 2004. GIS and genetic algorithms for HAZMAT route planning with

security considerations. International Journal Geographical Information Science 18(8): 769–787.

Dilgir, R., Zein, S. R. & Popoff, A. l 2005. Dangerous goods route selection criteria. Paper prepared for

presentation at the Towards a Safer Road Network Session of the 2005 Annual Conference of the

Transportation Association of Canada Calgary, Alberta.

Han, K. 2006. Developing a GIS-based decision support system for transportation system planning. Paper

submitted to AASHTO GIS-T 2006 Student Paper Contest.

Panwhar, S. T., Pitt, Robert. & Anderson, M. D. 2000. Development of a GIS-Based hazardous

materials transportation management system. Publication of the University Transportation Centre

for Alabama. Report 99244.

Nema, A. K. & Gupta, S. K. 2003. Multiobjective risk analysis and optimization of regional hazardous

waste management system. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

Management. ASCE 69-77.

Huang, B. & Fery, P. 2005. Multiobjective optimization for hazardous materials transportation.

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 64-73

Zhang, M., Ma, Y. & Wen, K. 2005. Location-routing model of hazardous materials distribution system

based on risk bottleneck. ICSSSM 1: 362-368. Proceedings of ICSSSM ‘05. 2005 International

Conference on Services Systems and Services Management.

Frank, W. C., Thill, J. C. & Batta, R. 2000. Spatial decision support system for hazardous material truck

routing. Transportation Research Part C 8: 337-359.

Jin, H., Batta, R. & Karwan, M. H. 1995. On the analysis of two new models for transporting hazardous

materials operations research 44(5): 710-723

Lepofsky, M., Abkowitz, M. & Cheng, P. 1993. Transportation hazard analysis in integrated GIS

environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering 119(2): 239-254.

Brainard, J., Lovett, A. & Parfitt, T. J. 1996. Assessing hazardous waste transport risks using a GIS.

International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10: 831–849.

Karim El-Basyouny and Tarek Sayed

Lovett, A, Parfitt J. P. & Brainard, J. S. 1997. Using GIS in risk analysis: A case study of hazardous

waste transport. Risk Anal 17(5): 625-33.

Emergency Response Guidebook 2008. US Department of Transportation, Transport Canada, Secretariat

of Transport and Communications of Mexico.

Shortreed, J., Belluz, D., Saccomanno, F. F., Nassar, S., Craig, L. & Paoli, G. 1994. Transportation risk

assessment for the Alberta special waste management system (Final Report). Waterloo, Ontario,

Canada: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo.

Waters, W. G., Wong, C. & Megale, K. 1995. Value of commercial vehicle time savings for the evaluation

of highway investment a resource saving approach. Journal of public Economics 35.

Published
2014-09-29