Enhancing filterability of activated sludge by DC electric field

Elif Sekman

Abstract


The purpose of the current study is to enhance filterability of activated sludge by applying controlled DC electric field via perforated aluminum electrodes, meantime to provide an ineffective electric current on bacterial life. The studies were conducted in a 12 L laboratory scale cylindrical reactor. Recirculated activated sludge was provided from a full scale advanced biological wastewater treatment plant. The effects of exposure time (2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min) and potential gradient (0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1 V/cm) are evaluated mainly by the results of specific resistance to filtration (SRF). The results also supported with variations in physical (pH, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and temperature) and soluble biochemical (chemical oxygen demand (COD), orthophosphate (PO4-P), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N)) properties of activated sludge. Electrical parameters (current density, energy consumption, and theoretical aluminum consumption) were studied to evaluate the most cost effective DC field vs. exposure time variation. Based on SRF experiments, energy consumption, and theoretical aluminum generation, optimal condition for enhancing filterability is recommended as 0.2 V/cm potential gradient applied for 5 min.


Keywords


Activated sludge; DC electric field; potential gradient; sludge filterability; SRF

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbal, F. & Camcı, S. 2011. Copper, chromium and nickel removal from metal plating wastewater by electrocoagulation. Desalination 269: 214-222.

Alshawabkeh, A.N., Shen, Y. & Maillacheruvu, K.Y. 2004. Effect of DC electric fields on COD in aerobic mixed sludge processes. Environmental Engineering Science 21: 321-329.

APHA. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation. 21st edition, Washington, DC. Pp. 1496.

Baldwin, D.D. & Campbell, C.E. 2001. Short-term effects of low pH on the microfauna of an activated sludge wastewater treatment system. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 36: 519-535.

Bani-Melhem, K. & Electorowicz, M. 2010. Development of a novel submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR): Performance for fouling reduction. Environmental Science & Technology 44: 3298-3304.

Bani-Melhem, K. & Electorowicz, M. 2011. Performance of the submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR) with iron electrodes for wastewater treatment and fouling reduction. Journal of Membrane Science 379: 434-439.

Chen, J.P., Yang, C.Z., Zhouc, J.H. & Wang, X.Y. 2007. Study of the influence of the electric field on membrane flux of a new type of membrane bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal 128: 177-180.

Foladori, P., Andreottola, G. & Ziglio, G. 2011. Sludge reduction technologies in wastewater treatment plants. London, IWA Publishing. Pp. 365.

Huang, X. & Wu, J. 2008. Improvement of membrane filterability of the mixed liquor in a membrane bioreactor by ozonation. Journal of Membrane Science 318: 210-216.

Judd, S. 2011. The MBR book, principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2nd Edition, Oxford. Pp. 536.

Krzeminski, P., Iglesias-Obelleiro, A., Madebo, G., Garrido, J.M. & Van Der Graaf, J.H.J.M. 2012. Impact of temperature on raw wastewater composition and activated sludge filterability in full-scale MBR systems for municipal sewage treatment. Journal of Membrane Science 348: 423-424.

Lambert, J., Vega, M.M., Isarain-Chavez, E. & Peralta-Hernandez, J.M. 2013. Ozone and electrocoagulation processes for treatment of dye in leather industry wastewater: a comparative study. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 3(7): 1-9.

Liu, L., Liu, J., Gao, B. & Yang, F. 2012. Minute electric field reduced membrane fouling and improved performance of membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology 86: 106-112.

Mara, D. & Horan, N. 2003. Handbook of water and wastewater microbiology. Academic Press, London. Pp. 832.

Metcalf & Eddy. 2002. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw Hill, New York. Pp. 1408.

Noyes, R. 1994. Unit operations in environmental engineering. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey. Pp. 515.

Sanin, D., Clarkson, W.W. & Vesilind, P.A. 2011. Sludge engineering: the treatment and disposal of wastewater sludges. Pennsylvania, DEStech Publications, Inc. Pp. 393.

Srinivas, T. 2008. Environmental biotechnology. New Age International (P) Ltd., New Delhi. Pp. 113.

Top, S., Sekman, E., Hoşver, S. & Bilgili, M.S. 2011. Characterization and electrocaogulative treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of a full-scale landfill leachate treatment plant. Desalination 268: 158-162.

Troiani, C., Eusebi, A.L. & Battistoni, P. 2011. Excess sludge reduction by biological way: From experimental experience to a real full scale application. Bioresource Technology 102: 10352-10358.

Ukiwe, L.N., Ibeneme, S.I., Duru, C.E., Okolue, B.N., Onyedika, G.O. & Nweze, C.A. Chemical and electrocoagulation techniques in coagulation-floccculationin water and wastewater treatment- a review. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences 18(3): 285-294.

Wu, J., Chen, F., Huang, X., Gneg, W. & Wen, X. 2006. Using inorganic coagulants to control membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination 197: 124-136.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.